Friday, 23 September 2011
Milestone coming
Quick post: I've just noticed that I have 690 subscribers. I need to make another milestone patch...
Unemployed
You may be aware, from other posts, that I have lost my job.
The county council closed a whole swathe of Middle School, ostensibly to improve pupils' education, but the evidence used was interpreted spuriously, because the real motive was to save money; they've removed a whole layer of management-level wages, admin staff, support staff, and even the teaching staff.
Anyhoo, the upshot is that I was made redundant - career-wise, I fall between two stools, being too expensive to compete with NQTs, yet too inexperienced at KS4/KS5 to compete with more expensive time-served teachers.
So...
I'm out of work.
And, oddly, I'm quite enjoying it.
Last time I was out of work, it was incredibly stressful - zero income, we lost the house and it took a complete career-change to get me back into work. I ended up in a very dark place.
This time, though...
My wife's job is safe, and is enough for a living wage. I have a lump of cash in the bank that will tide us over "in the manner to which we have become accustomed" at least until Christmas, longer if I'm careful.
During the day, kids at school, on my own, home is a very different place. It's quiet, I don't get uninterrupted. I potter around, keeping up to date with the house work, finally starting to beat the garden into submission (although the pond liner has perished and sprung numerous leaks, so I need to replace that soon), and I'm being far more productive on Instructables. I'm confident of beating my personal target of "publish more projects than Christy" well before the end of October (she's currently on 133, I'm on 130, so as long as she doesn't have a publishing flurry...).
Life is good.
I've decided, though, that it can't go on (unemployment, I mean. Life can. I'm quite keen on Life.).
So, I'm looking for work, and I've decided to have another career change and I can afford, for the moment, to be choosy about which jobs I go for.
I'm still going to teach, but I want to switch subjects. I want to switch to Technology ("shop", to our colonial cousins), specifically "Resistant Materials" (although I'm not averse to Textiles or Food Tech...).
I spent a day in a high school RM department before the Summer, and the staff there said I had a "natural touch" for the subject, and a suitable vacancy has just come up.
Fingers crossed.
(That was a bit of a ramble, wasn't it? I think I need to get back to work to talk to real flesh-and-blood humans more...)
The county council closed a whole swathe of Middle School, ostensibly to improve pupils' education, but the evidence used was interpreted spuriously, because the real motive was to save money; they've removed a whole layer of management-level wages, admin staff, support staff, and even the teaching staff.
Anyhoo, the upshot is that I was made redundant - career-wise, I fall between two stools, being too expensive to compete with NQTs, yet too inexperienced at KS4/KS5 to compete with more expensive time-served teachers.
So...
I'm out of work.
And, oddly, I'm quite enjoying it.
Last time I was out of work, it was incredibly stressful - zero income, we lost the house and it took a complete career-change to get me back into work. I ended up in a very dark place.
This time, though...
My wife's job is safe, and is enough for a living wage. I have a lump of cash in the bank that will tide us over "in the manner to which we have become accustomed" at least until Christmas, longer if I'm careful.
During the day, kids at school, on my own, home is a very different place. It's quiet, I don't get uninterrupted. I potter around, keeping up to date with the house work, finally starting to beat the garden into submission (although the pond liner has perished and sprung numerous leaks, so I need to replace that soon), and I'm being far more productive on Instructables. I'm confident of beating my personal target of "publish more projects than Christy" well before the end of October (she's currently on 133, I'm on 130, so as long as she doesn't have a publishing flurry...).
Life is good.
I've decided, though, that it can't go on (unemployment, I mean. Life can. I'm quite keen on Life.).
So, I'm looking for work, and I've decided to have another career change and I can afford, for the moment, to be choosy about which jobs I go for.
I'm still going to teach, but I want to switch subjects. I want to switch to Technology ("shop", to our colonial cousins), specifically "Resistant Materials" (although I'm not averse to Textiles or Food Tech...).
I spent a day in a high school RM department before the Summer, and the staff there said I had a "natural touch" for the subject, and a suitable vacancy has just come up.
Fingers crossed.
(That was a bit of a ramble, wasn't it? I think I need to get back to work to talk to real flesh-and-blood humans more...)
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
FAIL
I can safely say that the world is much more amazing place than when I was a child.
Mobile phones, personal computers, more than three TV channels, instant communication with anybody on the planet, and affordable travel to any point on the globe in 24 hours.
Society evolves to cope with these changes, cultures move on, but we seem to be perpetually stuck with dickheads.
In fact, we seem to be suffering with them more and more. The gimme, I'm entitled generation. They all "know their rights", but cannot grasp the notion that there are responsibilities concomitant with those rights.
Individuals are excusing their own actions, not because they are right, but because they are not as bad as they might be.
In the UK's August riots, a youth was prosecuted because he went to the riots with a hammer strapped to his thigh. His defence? "But, I always carry it!"
The mother who went on holiday and left here children home alone, but is was OK, because it was "only for the week".
And somehow these "rights" become "permission" for all sorts of activity. The right to free speech becomes the right to burn down shops and rob passing tourists.
And this entitlement seems to be only one-way.
A mob believes it is entitled to wreck a community shopping centre, but how dare that community object! How dare the police intervene!
A stereotypical hoodie gave a telling sound-bite on the news - "We're exercising our right to protest Iraq, innit? Them police got no right to stop us." The Iraq war, of course, being over for quite some time, and nothing to do with the original trigger for the original protests.
By the same measure, people online claim the right to free speech, but they get upset when others use that same right to disagree with them.
They think that, because The Man doesn't listen to their whining demands, and act instantly, no matter what those demands are, or how busy The Man happens to be at that time, then they have some sort of "right" to protest because It's Not Fair, and that protest can be whatever they like.
So, they call a few people names - that's OK, because it could be worse.
They hack a website with some silly messages - nothing wrong with that, it could have been worse. They claim some sort of immunity from comment or retaliation, claiming there was nothing wrong with what they did, purely on the grounds that they could have done far worse.
What infantile, immature, irresponsible nonsense that is!
Think about it, entitled generation:
-------------------
Yes, this is a rant of sorts. Yes, this is a temper-tantrum of sorts.
I'm expressing my anger because just such an idiot attacked Instructables recently.
Naturally, several people objected, but this moron thought we should be thanking him for his attack, because he had warned the site that there was a security issue, but they hadn't responded quickly enough for his tastes.
He actually admitted that: his hacking attacks were the direct result of his own childish impatience.
Reality check, Ballboy.
A complete stranger sends you an email full of threatening instructions - are you going to follow them immediately?
Or are you going to spend some time checking things out? Personally, any emails I get along the lines of "act now to rectify this serious security issue" get reported as phishing scams before I get past the first line or two.
So, HQ don't immediately leap into action, smother this guy with gratitude and offers of a job*. The response? He hacks the site, popping puerile comments up all over the place.
But, "that's OK, because it could have been worse". HQ start to work on the problems, but not fast enough for the hacker's tastes, so he renders the whole site useless.
That's not enough for him, though. I objected to his actions. I called him what he is - immature and a vandal. His grandstanding and shouts of "well it could have been worse" do not persuade me that his vandalism is justified, so he took the coward's way out. He silenced me. He couldn't persuade me, he couldn't out-debate me, and he had only one other person even suggest he might be slightly right, so he "proved" he was better than me by replacing my avatar with a horse, and posting childish forum topics in my name.
To top that, he stole several hundred dollars-worth of pro-codes from my account.
I've got a message for Ballboy - FAIL.
You think that committing theft proves that you are trying to help? Your cowardly, bullying actions simply demonstrate that I was right about you all along.
*Speaking of jobs, this idiot thinks that hacking gets you a job. Reality check, Ballboy - maybe most people in digital security used to be hackers, but most hackers do not get jobs in digital security. There's a *reason* why this guy describes himself as "impoverished", and trying to get "donations" through blackmail is it.
Mobile phones, personal computers, more than three TV channels, instant communication with anybody on the planet, and affordable travel to any point on the globe in 24 hours.
Society evolves to cope with these changes, cultures move on, but we seem to be perpetually stuck with dickheads.
In fact, we seem to be suffering with them more and more. The gimme, I'm entitled generation. They all "know their rights", but cannot grasp the notion that there are responsibilities concomitant with those rights.
Individuals are excusing their own actions, not because they are right, but because they are not as bad as they might be.
In the UK's August riots, a youth was prosecuted because he went to the riots with a hammer strapped to his thigh. His defence? "But, I always carry it!"
The mother who went on holiday and left here children home alone, but is was OK, because it was "only for the week".
And somehow these "rights" become "permission" for all sorts of activity. The right to free speech becomes the right to burn down shops and rob passing tourists.
And this entitlement seems to be only one-way.
A mob believes it is entitled to wreck a community shopping centre, but how dare that community object! How dare the police intervene!
A stereotypical hoodie gave a telling sound-bite on the news - "We're exercising our right to protest Iraq, innit? Them police got no right to stop us." The Iraq war, of course, being over for quite some time, and nothing to do with the original trigger for the original protests.
By the same measure, people online claim the right to free speech, but they get upset when others use that same right to disagree with them.
They think that, because The Man doesn't listen to their whining demands, and act instantly, no matter what those demands are, or how busy The Man happens to be at that time, then they have some sort of "right" to protest because It's Not Fair, and that protest can be whatever they like.
So, they call a few people names - that's OK, because it could be worse.
They hack a website with some silly messages - nothing wrong with that, it could have been worse. They claim some sort of immunity from comment or retaliation, claiming there was nothing wrong with what they did, purely on the grounds that they could have done far worse.
What infantile, immature, irresponsible nonsense that is!
Think about it, entitled generation:
- I stab you in the leg, but I could have stabbed you in the heart, so you have no grounds to object to my actions.
- I steal your wallet, but it's OK, because I could have kidnapped your daughter.
- I taunt a minority, but that's OK, because I could have started a pogrom.
-------------------
Yes, this is a rant of sorts. Yes, this is a temper-tantrum of sorts.
I'm expressing my anger because just such an idiot attacked Instructables recently.
Naturally, several people objected, but this moron thought we should be thanking him for his attack, because he had warned the site that there was a security issue, but they hadn't responded quickly enough for his tastes.
He actually admitted that: his hacking attacks were the direct result of his own childish impatience.
Reality check, Ballboy.
A complete stranger sends you an email full of threatening instructions - are you going to follow them immediately?
Or are you going to spend some time checking things out? Personally, any emails I get along the lines of "act now to rectify this serious security issue" get reported as phishing scams before I get past the first line or two.
So, HQ don't immediately leap into action, smother this guy with gratitude and offers of a job*. The response? He hacks the site, popping puerile comments up all over the place.
But, "that's OK, because it could have been worse". HQ start to work on the problems, but not fast enough for the hacker's tastes, so he renders the whole site useless.
That's not enough for him, though. I objected to his actions. I called him what he is - immature and a vandal. His grandstanding and shouts of "well it could have been worse" do not persuade me that his vandalism is justified, so he took the coward's way out. He silenced me. He couldn't persuade me, he couldn't out-debate me, and he had only one other person even suggest he might be slightly right, so he "proved" he was better than me by replacing my avatar with a horse, and posting childish forum topics in my name.
To top that, he stole several hundred dollars-worth of pro-codes from my account.
I've got a message for Ballboy - FAIL.
You think that committing theft proves that you are trying to help? Your cowardly, bullying actions simply demonstrate that I was right about you all along.
*Speaking of jobs, this idiot thinks that hacking gets you a job. Reality check, Ballboy - maybe most people in digital security used to be hackers, but most hackers do not get jobs in digital security. There's a *reason* why this guy describes himself as "impoverished", and trying to get "donations" through blackmail is it.
Monday, 29 August 2011
Disaster
Natural disasters are awe-inspiring things. Far beyond human influence or control, it is hardly a surprise that they have always been credited to (or blamed on) the supernatural.
I've noticed, though, that the way we react to them is changing.
For a start, we find out about more of them, more quickly. March's TÅhoku earthquake hit the news so quickly that cameras were in the air in time to watch the tsunami hit. In years gone by, it would have been hours, days, weeks before we found out about it. During the Christchurch earthquake, shortly before that, tremors were being tweeted before they finished, and people were blogging in between tremors.
The reactions to disasters change as well. From a spectacle distant to us in both time and miles, live updates mean we are aware of more disasters on a day-by-day basis, so sometimes it looks as though they are increasing in frequency, which delights that certain breed of extremist ready to welcome the death of thousands as a sign of The End, or a reason to persecute those who don't follow their own rules (remember how New Orleans was apparently hit by the hurricane as a punishment for harbouring homosexuals?).
On the upside, we can get help to the victims more quickly, although sometimes the nature of that help needs to be more carefully thought out. Although I'm sure the Haitians were delighted with the delivery of 600 solar-powered bibles, I am thoroughly bemused by the assumption of so many churches that the first need of starving, thirsty, homeless people is for a really nice copy of the bible - Massachusetts congregations ordered 5000 French bibles for all those poor victims.
Anyhoo, that's a different rant.
What I'm thinking about right now is the strange connections the internet gives to disasters these days...
Not that I feel like a victim, but I feel their effects more acutely than I did in the years BI (Before Internet), and, you know what?
Rather than making me feel as though the world is out to get me, rather than making The End look ever closer, it makes me feel somehow more human.
No, I don't fully grok that yet, but I think it's a good thing.
I've noticed, though, that the way we react to them is changing.
For a start, we find out about more of them, more quickly. March's TÅhoku earthquake hit the news so quickly that cameras were in the air in time to watch the tsunami hit. In years gone by, it would have been hours, days, weeks before we found out about it. During the Christchurch earthquake, shortly before that, tremors were being tweeted before they finished, and people were blogging in between tremors.
The reactions to disasters change as well. From a spectacle distant to us in both time and miles, live updates mean we are aware of more disasters on a day-by-day basis, so sometimes it looks as though they are increasing in frequency, which delights that certain breed of extremist ready to welcome the death of thousands as a sign of The End, or a reason to persecute those who don't follow their own rules (remember how New Orleans was apparently hit by the hurricane as a punishment for harbouring homosexuals?).
On the upside, we can get help to the victims more quickly, although sometimes the nature of that help needs to be more carefully thought out. Although I'm sure the Haitians were delighted with the delivery of 600 solar-powered bibles, I am thoroughly bemused by the assumption of so many churches that the first need of starving, thirsty, homeless people is for a really nice copy of the bible - Massachusetts congregations ordered 5000 French bibles for all those poor victims.
Anyhoo, that's a different rant.
What I'm thinking about right now is the strange connections the internet gives to disasters these days...
- One of the first friends I made on the internet had to evacuate during forest fires in California.
- A friend's sister was caught up in forest fires in Australia.
- An ex-colleague and several iblers were caught in the Christchurch earthquake.
- My wife has family who moved from Hawaii because of the storms. They now live near New York.
- My mother was in Egypt during the last lot of trouble there.
- And, of course, there are all the iblers caught in the path of Irene...
Not that I feel like a victim, but I feel their effects more acutely than I did in the years BI (Before Internet), and, you know what?
Rather than making me feel as though the world is out to get me, rather than making The End look ever closer, it makes me feel somehow more human.
No, I don't fully grok that yet, but I think it's a good thing.
Labels:
disaster,
earthquake,
flood,
Haiti,
humanity,
hurricane,
Japan,
New Orleans,
New York
Thursday, 11 August 2011
Riots and rights.
I've been wondering how to approach the riots the started in London and spread to other UK cites.
I've worked it out: I'm sorry.
Although hundreds of people were involved, and probably millions of of pounds worth of damage has been done (not to mention the number of innocent families made homeless when mobs looted and torched the shops over which they lived), these people are not typical of Britain.
They show us in a bad light.
OK, so we've had riots in the past, frequently on a much larger scale, but they were riots with a reason. They were mass action against racism or government policy.
These riots stopped being a legitimate protest within a couple of hours.
Since then, they have been purely criminal. Mobs using a false sense of "entitlement" as an excuse to go shopping with a brick.
Nobody can pretend there is a political motivation to a woman caught on CCTV, sitting in a smashed shoe-shop window, trying on the displays.
No sane human can find the actions of the infamous "Bad Samaritans" as anything but abhorrent.
People have been trying to explain the riots, pin blame on something so that a quick fix can be pasted over the cracks and look like something useful.
"It's the internet, blame the social networks" is the most common cry, yet also the weakest excuse. Of course, folk used SMS, Twitter and Blackberry Messenger to get organised, but that's just the modern equivalent of yelling in the streets with a megaphone. Technology wasn't the reason or cause of the riots, just a tool of the criminals.
To me, the problem is deeper than that, and has been worming its way into the social psyche for years.
A sense of "entitlement" has taken over from a sense of social responsibility. People feel they are entitled, not just to being kept fed and sheltered, but to being entertained and pandered to. The acquisition of material goods becomes prioritised over mental and emotional well-being.
As a teacher, I have often heard children and parents declaring that they "know their rights", whilst simultaneously trampling or ignoring the rights of others. These are the same children who misbehave until somebody shuts them up by buying them a new game for the PlayStation, the same parents who think that it is more important to buy an iPhone for their 12 year old than it is to clothe them properly, or to encourage them to read or work hard at school.
Who needs to work for stuff when The Social will provide it anyway? Why should politicians spend their own money, when they can claim for luxuries on expenses?
This all sounds like I am blaming the welfare state, but I'm not. The welfare state, run properly, is a wonderful thing. When I was unemployed, it kept a roof over my head and food in my belly. It provided advice to help me get back on my feet and become independent again.
But, somewhere along the line, that last part has gone missing. People are too eager to take the material stuff, and leave the independent bit to waste away.
There is no quick fix to the causes of these riots, but there is a fix.
It is time to remind people, at every level of society, that for every entitlement, for every right, there is a responsibility.
A responsibility to ensure that everybody has equal access to their rights.
One of the great documents of human history is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The kind of folk who were at the heart of the riots are very keen on appealing to the idea of Human Rights to get their way, but I doubt they have ever actually read them. Shall we do that now?
Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Is that what the rioters were doing when they set fire to people's homes? When they robbed Asyraf Haziq?
Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Tell that to the woman who had to leap from a fourth-floor window to escape a fire.
Tell that to the three men mown down and killed by a car, just because they did not want rioters to loot their local shops.
Article 17 (2): No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
And what would looting be?
Article 20 (1): Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
See that important word? "Peaceful". As soon as the original protest stopped being peaceful, the rioters threw away their own rights.
Article 29 (1): Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
Hang on...
See that? I'd bet a year's pay that none of those people hiding behind the banner of "it's my right" have absolutely no idea that one of their "rights" is actually a responsibility to contribute positively to their community.
Part two also implies a responsibility to ensure that public order is maintained to allow society to function.
So, what we, the sane members of society need to do is to ensure that the deeply materialist, "entitlement" driven members of society are educated about the true nature of "rights".
Obviously, schools must do a large part of the work, but the greater part must be done by parents. They must instil in their children a spirit of independence from free help wherever possible, and a respect for the rights of others, including the wider community.
Stop using bribes to buy reasonable behaviour, start rewarding good behaviour instead.
I've worked it out: I'm sorry.
Although hundreds of people were involved, and probably millions of of pounds worth of damage has been done (not to mention the number of innocent families made homeless when mobs looted and torched the shops over which they lived), these people are not typical of Britain.
They show us in a bad light.
OK, so we've had riots in the past, frequently on a much larger scale, but they were riots with a reason. They were mass action against racism or government policy.
These riots stopped being a legitimate protest within a couple of hours.
Since then, they have been purely criminal. Mobs using a false sense of "entitlement" as an excuse to go shopping with a brick.
Nobody can pretend there is a political motivation to a woman caught on CCTV, sitting in a smashed shoe-shop window, trying on the displays.
No sane human can find the actions of the infamous "Bad Samaritans" as anything but abhorrent.
People have been trying to explain the riots, pin blame on something so that a quick fix can be pasted over the cracks and look like something useful.
"It's the internet, blame the social networks" is the most common cry, yet also the weakest excuse. Of course, folk used SMS, Twitter and Blackberry Messenger to get organised, but that's just the modern equivalent of yelling in the streets with a megaphone. Technology wasn't the reason or cause of the riots, just a tool of the criminals.
To me, the problem is deeper than that, and has been worming its way into the social psyche for years.
A sense of "entitlement" has taken over from a sense of social responsibility. People feel they are entitled, not just to being kept fed and sheltered, but to being entertained and pandered to. The acquisition of material goods becomes prioritised over mental and emotional well-being.
As a teacher, I have often heard children and parents declaring that they "know their rights", whilst simultaneously trampling or ignoring the rights of others. These are the same children who misbehave until somebody shuts them up by buying them a new game for the PlayStation, the same parents who think that it is more important to buy an iPhone for their 12 year old than it is to clothe them properly, or to encourage them to read or work hard at school.
Who needs to work for stuff when The Social will provide it anyway? Why should politicians spend their own money, when they can claim for luxuries on expenses?
This all sounds like I am blaming the welfare state, but I'm not. The welfare state, run properly, is a wonderful thing. When I was unemployed, it kept a roof over my head and food in my belly. It provided advice to help me get back on my feet and become independent again.
But, somewhere along the line, that last part has gone missing. People are too eager to take the material stuff, and leave the independent bit to waste away.
There is no quick fix to the causes of these riots, but there is a fix.
It is time to remind people, at every level of society, that for every entitlement, for every right, there is a responsibility.
A responsibility to ensure that everybody has equal access to their rights.
One of the great documents of human history is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The kind of folk who were at the heart of the riots are very keen on appealing to the idea of Human Rights to get their way, but I doubt they have ever actually read them. Shall we do that now?
Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Is that what the rioters were doing when they set fire to people's homes? When they robbed Asyraf Haziq?
Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Tell that to the woman who had to leap from a fourth-floor window to escape a fire.
Tell that to the three men mown down and killed by a car, just because they did not want rioters to loot their local shops.
Article 17 (2): No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
And what would looting be?
Article 20 (1): Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
See that important word? "Peaceful". As soon as the original protest stopped being peaceful, the rioters threw away their own rights.
Article 29 (1): Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
Hang on...
See that? I'd bet a year's pay that none of those people hiding behind the banner of "it's my right" have absolutely no idea that one of their "rights" is actually a responsibility to contribute positively to their community.
Part two also implies a responsibility to ensure that public order is maintained to allow society to function.
So, what we, the sane members of society need to do is to ensure that the deeply materialist, "entitlement" driven members of society are educated about the true nature of "rights".
Obviously, schools must do a large part of the work, but the greater part must be done by parents. They must instil in their children a spirit of independence from free help wherever possible, and a respect for the rights of others, including the wider community.
Stop using bribes to buy reasonable behaviour, start rewarding good behaviour instead.
Labels:
crime,
friend,
London,
punishment,
responsibility,
riot,
support
Sunday, 24 July 2011
Closed
My school is now closed, all bar the paper work.
I've cleared out my personal belongings, tidied up, and left a hidden graffiti message to be found when they knock it down.
We've had the big party, and a lot of folk (including me) have sobbed on a lot of other folk's shoulders.
But...
I still don't know how I feel about it.
It's such a big, involuntary change in my life, I'm tempted to liken it to a car crash or sudden bereavement. I'll get it straight in my head eventually, but it might take months.
Watch this space.
I've cleared out my personal belongings, tidied up, and left a hidden graffiti message to be found when they knock it down.
We've had the big party, and a lot of folk (including me) have sobbed on a lot of other folk's shoulders.
But...
I still don't know how I feel about it.
It's such a big, involuntary change in my life, I'm tempted to liken it to a car crash or sudden bereavement. I'll get it straight in my head eventually, but it might take months.
Watch this space.
Sunday, 3 April 2011
The Backup Plan
As my (hoards of) readers will know, my career is reaching a crunch-point.
My school is closing down in a few months, and I do not currently have anything for September.
I do, though, have a backup plan.
If I do not get a job in time, I will be starting a business instead.
I will be setting up as a provider of Technology and Science-based enrichment activities to schools in Suffolk and Norfolk, under the name of MakerDay.
It's a different blog, on a different system, with a different email address...
My school is closing down in a few months, and I do not currently have anything for September.
I do, though, have a backup plan.
If I do not get a job in time, I will be starting a business instead.
I will be setting up as a provider of Technology and Science-based enrichment activities to schools in Suffolk and Norfolk, under the name of MakerDay.
It's a different blog, on a different system, with a different email address...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)